Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Biological males in women's sport

  • 28-02-2018 7:32pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 8,081 ✭✭✭


    Just after reading an article about a transgender cyclist in NZ who won a womens race after competing as a man only 3 weeks ago. In the men's version of the race last year, this person finished 35th with a time that was still 10 seconds faster than the women's winner. Now here they are winning the women's event . How is this fair? Does anyone actually think this should be allowed?

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=12002309

    Here is an article specifically about the difference between the sexes when it comes to cycling. How can 3 weeks change any of this? don't even think 3 years of transition is going to change skeletal structure, lung size or blood volume

    http://www.cyclingweekly.com/fitness/cycling-and-gender-how-and-why-male-and-female-cyclists-need-to-train-differently-344365

    I've seen several stories recently about biological males competing in women's sports and not surprisingly trouncing the competition or even severely injuring their opponents (MMA fighter Fallon fox). Should MTF transgender athletes accept that they should be unable to compete against members of the opposite sex in the name of fairness? I totally get that they want to be and should be treated the same as any other other woman in everyday life but in some situations there are clear advantages. Is there a solution that is fair for everyone?


«13456772

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Will this thread make it to page 2?


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,423 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    From what I understand, they test the level of testosterone. Still imagine there is some advantages post transition in terms of bone density and muscle mass owing to their previous gender.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 32,688 ✭✭✭✭ytpe2r5bxkn0c1


    pjohnson wrote: »
    Will this thread make it to page 2?

    Depends on if it drifts to discussing the weather or sliced pans.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,246 ✭✭✭judeboy101




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 698 ✭✭✭Ajsoprano


    I’d stay away from this thread. The cards will fly no matter what happens.
    I’ve probably already said too much. I’m out of here.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 36,163 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    If I were her(his) competitor I'd be fierce pissed thats for sure.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 849 ✭✭✭Tenigate


    Fallon Fox broke a woman fighters skulls thanks to her masculine physique.

    International female running events are dominated by women who were born men.

    In US college sports women are losing to MTF transsexuals and female pre-op FTM who are allowed to use testosterone.

    It's a circus but it's only temporary. People are seeing the truth.


  • Registered Users Posts: 20,407 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    Ajsoprano wrote: »
    I’d stay away from this thread. The cards will fly no matter what happens.
    I’ve probably already said too much. I’m out of here.


    Should be OK.

    I'll hang back,make sure you're not followed.


  • Registered Users Posts: 38,247 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    Going by the articles posted, men have somewhere between a 10 and 12.5 % advantage over women. So unless a transgender athletes results drop by 10% at least post change, then they have an ongoing unfair advantage.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,423 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    See that one transgender competitor in a Texas wrestling match was booed.

    9ef1df39741564ed56d45dcba55d2fd5


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,263 ✭✭✭robyntmorton


    In this case, it was not 3 weeks and suddenly there’s a man competing in women’s cycling. She was required to meet requirements for testosterone levels over a minimum of 12 months before she could make the switch. This is in line with standard rules for UCI sanctioned events, and there are others who have done this before. Further MtF trans athletes tend to be paranoid about making sure they are within the rules, as a single failed test for testosterone can give a hefty 2 year ban.

    She complied with the rules, was allowed to compete within those rules, and this time won.

    If a question must be asked, it is whether the rules are correct or need to be tweaked? It is very difficult to do scientific testing on this though, for the simple reason of there being so few transgender elite athletes.


  • Registered Users Posts: 219 ✭✭todders


    Going by the articles posted, men have somewhere between a 10 and 12.5 % advantage over women. So unless a transgender athletes results drop by 10% at least post change, then they have an ongoing unfair advantage.

    Do you usually form your opinions on a single article?


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,081 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    See that one transgender competitor in a Texas wrestling match was booed.

    9ef1df39741564ed56d45dcba55d2fd5

    Well it's also unfair that a female transman using testosterone is allowed to compete when others would be banned for doping. I don't have the first clue about wrestling so I'm not sure if it would be safe for him to compete in the male division?


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,423 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    ceadaoin. wrote: »
    Well it's also unfair that a female transman using testosterone is allowed to compete when others would be banned for doping. I don't have the first clue about wrestling so I'm not sure if it would be safe for him to compete in the male division?

    Yeah as someone with very little knowledge about wrestling, it seems unfair.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,256 ✭✭✭Ronin247


    There should be no women only events because that is sexism.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,431 ✭✭✭MilesMorales1


    Depends on if it drifts to discussing the weather or sliced pans.

    I can't find any bloody sliced pans what is there to discuss.


  • Registered Users Posts: 38,247 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    todders wrote: »
    Do you usually form your opinions on a single article?

    It sites a couple of different studies.

    Even a basic look at world records or winning times for each gender across individual sports will show big differences.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,081 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    Yeah as someone with very little knowledge about wrestling, it seems unfair.

    Well the very fact that the he is allowed to take a substance that gives athletic advantage and that is prohibited for other competitors is unfair. Do I need to be an expert on wrestling to see that?


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,423 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    ceadaoin. wrote: »
    Well the very fact that the he is allowed to take a substance that gives athletic advantage and that is prohibited for other competitors is unfair. Do I need to be an expert on wrestling to see that?

    We might be about to see a golden era in women's' sport or something else...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 849 ✭✭✭Tenigate


    todders wrote: »
    Do you usually form your opinions on a single article?

    A junior cert biology book won't see ya too far wrong.

    Or that famous quote from kindergarten cop.

    There's 2 sources.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,081 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    It sites a couple of different studies.

    Even a basic look at world records or winning times for each gender across individual sports will show big differences.

    Women's world records are generally 90% that of men's according to this article

    https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/08/the-golden-ratio-the-one-number-that-describes-how-mens-world-records-compare-with-womens/260758/


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 698 ✭✭✭Ajsoprano


    Tenigate wrote: »
    A junior cert biology book won't see ya too far wrong.

    Or that famous quote from kindergarten cop.

    There's 2 sources.

    Who is your daddy and what does he do.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,189 ✭✭✭Malayalam


    This situation was always going to arise. It is a clear demonstration of the difficulties in real time of a modern ideology based in denying the biological basis of gender. By that I mean gender at the X and Y chromosone cellular level. There will be many more real time situations when the ideology meets the trickiness of gendered life and causes problems, like in women's prisons, women's shelters, women's changing rooms, and so on. It will be interesting to watch. As far as I can see right now women's sport is over. I have read the research about hormones negating birth gender advantage - I don't believe it, not from the physiques I am seeing. Trans Female to Male will rarely best a birth male. Trans Male to Female is very likely to best a birth female in most sports. Females from birth will simply have to remove themselves from the arena to avoid injury at the very least.

    The crazy thing is in stating my opinion thus I have probably offended trans-activists and supporters so deeply on many levels, and will be called trans-phobic and a hate-speaker, and that is not my intention at all. I am simply reporting how I see it on a simple physical, biological level.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 849 ✭✭✭Tenigate


    ceadaoin. wrote: »
    Women's world records are generally 90% that of men's according to this article

    Well it's simple.
    Simply reduce an XY female's testosterone level, and her muscle will deteriorate and bone density will reduce. That's part of it.
    Now file down her bones and destroy part of her lung capacity. And pop in a female reproductive system.
    And hey presto..
    You got yourself a bonfide female.

    My view. Either abolish female categories altogether, or redefine the category to exclude anyone and everyone with Y chromosomes. You don't need to specify their gender or sex or anything else. We're just talking about a genetic advantage and a separate division for people without that advantage.


  • Registered Users Posts: 219 ✭✭todders


    It sites a couple of different studies.

    Even a basic look at world records or winning times for each gender across individual sports will show big differences.

    Studies you've read and verified separately to this one article?


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,246 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    This can only be a good thing, it will encourage the women to up their game.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Politics Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 81,310 CMod ✭✭✭✭coffee_cake


    While they are female i am surprised it doesn't fall under doping rules


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,492 ✭✭✭pleas advice


    If there are gold medals won, or records broken, I can see these being stripped by ruling bodies in the future


  • Registered Users Posts: 219 ✭✭todders


    bluewolf wrote: »
    While they are female i am surprised it doesn't fall under doping rules

    Why?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,813 ✭✭✭Noveight


    Reminds me of the story of Laurel Hubbard (formerly Gavin), a trans weightlifter from New Zealand.

    She'll be competing in the 2018 Commonwealth games in April. The results of those events should be interesting to see.


Advertisement