Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Brexit Discussion Thread VI

Options
1316318320321322

Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 37,600 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    sKeith wrote: »
    If they lower tariffs to zero, does that mean, for example, that british garages could import loads of cheap Chinese cars and not have to pay any import tax on them?

    Import tax sounds like something Westminster would control as opposed to being an international trade thing.

    We sat again for an hour and a half discussing maps and figures and always getting back to that most damnable creation of the perverted ingenuity of man - the County of Tyrone.

    H. H. Asquith



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,742 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    eagle eye wrote: »
    I don't give a continental about trade blocs or EU rules if it's going to lead to troubles in NI which will spread into the Republic.
    You are willing to let her innocent people watch on in horror as this stuff starts up again and we all know there will be innocent victims just to put it to the UK?
    <SNIP>


    Yeah the EU really arent at fault here, the UK is responsible for this mess and nobody else.

    BTW saying you don't give a "continental" about trade blocs or EU rules is exactly what brexiteers said before and since the referendum......


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,869 ✭✭✭trellheim


    if its no-deal do borders have to go up in Gib and Cyprus as well ( the SBAs)


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,468 ✭✭✭spacecoyote


    sKeith wrote: »
    If they lower tariffs to zero, does that mean, for example, that british garages could import loads of cheap Chinese cars and not have to pay any import tax on them?

    Not 100% if that's what it means.

    But if it did mean that, then, in essence it would mean thousands of more jobs gone in the UK I would think.

    Why would any manufacturer in the UK keep production there when they could move it somewhere considerably cheaper & just export to the UK (that, or just end up going out of business)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,471 ✭✭✭EdgeCase


    Well a lot of the architects of this chaos are also diehard libertarians, who believe that the state is just an impediment to free trade and nothing should be taxed or tarrifed.

    I'm not at all convinced that's what most Brexiteers thought they were voting for. Many of them actually seemed to vote for Brexit to "take back control" of the economy into political hands, not to remove all controls entirely which is where this is going.

    Much like American voters, they've fallen for a set of policies that could only ever benefit the super wealthy and will probably undermine most ordinary people.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 14,822 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    sKeith wrote:
    If they lower tariffs to zero, does that mean, for example, that british garages could import loads of cheap Chinese cars and not have to pay any import tax on them?


    If they strike a bi-lateral free trade deal with China then, yes Chinese cars could be imported tax free. Of course Japan and every other auto making country would look for the same as part of their trade deals.

    It would be a quick way to decimate the UK auto industry but if port congestion blocks JIT parts supply, the UK auto industry is scuppered anyway.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,692 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Do people really believe that we have the logistical expertise to unify the country when we're incapable of building a children's hospital?
    I don't.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,858 ✭✭✭Russman


    eagle eye wrote: »
    I don't give a continental about trade blocs or EU rules if it's going to lead to troubles in NI which will spread into the Republic.
    You are willing to let her innocent people watch on in horror as this stuff starts up again and we all know there will be innocent victims just to put it to the UK?
    Well you are a disgusting human being if you are willing to sacrifice lives over this crap.
    **** borders, **** the UK, **** the EU if they let this happen. All of them, they are all playing a part on this.

    For a start, nobody is asking for any lives to be sacrificed. Nobody is going to force anyone to pick up a gun or make a bomb, that's all their own choice if they so do. You know, like taking responsibility for ones own actions ?

    All anyone of a nationalist leaning up there needs is patience and this would play itself out over a few months and the UK would likely be looking for a deal from the EU and part of that deal would no doubt be the border issue.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,268 Mod ✭✭✭✭Chips Lovell


    Hi folks,
    Let's keep it civil and remember the charter:
    No personal abuse. NEVER attack a poster. Attack the content of their post. (You can tell someone that their opinion is based on incomplete or incorrect information, but do not call them an idiot.)
    No trolling or feeding the trolls. (including no excuses for joining a flaming match)

    Keep your language civil, particularly when referring to other posters and people in the public eye.

    Be nice. Thank you.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,471 ✭✭✭EdgeCase


    josip wrote: »
    Do people really believe that we have the logistical expertise to unify the country when we're incapable of building a children's hospital?
    I don't.

    Single projects go horribly wrong in most countries from time to time. Take a look at say nuclear plants - often go multiple times over budget. Boston's Big Dig... There's an endless list in the UK.

    The NCH project is an a absolute mess financially but it's hardly something to write off the whole country over.

    It's the product of bad management and political footballery by multiple political parties and often well meaning vested interests who kept moving the damn site, it's not just the current government.

    It's a risk of big, politically driven one off projects.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,869 ✭✭✭trellheim


    Folks : Updated guidance re driving in a post-brexit environment https://www.gov.uk/guidance/prepare-to-drive-in-the-eu-after-brexit (updated today )

    See especially sections on new plates and stickers for UK cars . Will crosspost to motors.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,143 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Marcusm wrote: »
    Gibraltar is one of those real weird places adding little to the world but the people there don’t want to be part of Spain. It’s s bit rich of Spain given Ceuta in Morocco is their version of Gibraltar.




    9 miles vs about 1000 miles in fairness.


    Not saying I agree with them keeping it, but they would have a far stronger argument than the Brits would have.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,471 ✭✭✭EdgeCase


    trellheim wrote: »
    Folks : Updated guidance re driving in a post-brexit environment https://www.gov.uk/guidance/prepare-to-drive-in-the-eu-after-brexit (updated today )

    See especially sections on new plates and stickers for UK cars . Will crosspost to motors.

    I can see that being more of an issue with UK cars entering France or other continental countries.

    We've never really enforced it and a lot of British and Northern Ireland cars have no identifying tags on the plates at all as it stands.

    I hope the UK doesn't start requiring those bloody big IRL stickers tho, even tho the symbol is included on our plates


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,646 ✭✭✭greenpilot


    Here is a question for you folks.

    I live in Co.Roscommon and the whole area is full of retired UK citizens who bought cheap houses and are living off their pensions while living permanently here in Ireland.
    Will they be entitled to receive their benefits while remaining here in Ireland? A few of the usual "We do things better in the UK" types are keen to tell me that they will be able to continue to live here as normal after Brexit.

    What do you think?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,637 ✭✭✭An Claidheamh


    greenpilot wrote: »
    A few of the usual "We do things better in the UK" types are keen to tell me that they will be able to continue to live here as normal after Brexit.

    What do you think?

    Same as their Spanish contingent so.

    Appears to be a British characteristic acting as mutton dressed as lamb, Northern unionists often pretend also to be shocked by facilities when in fact their own are 3rd world.

    I hope you told them they should go back to their own country then.... :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,811 ✭✭✭joe40


    With all this talk of a prospect or otherwise for a united Ireland, maybe there should be a poll among Boards members who are for NI resident.

    It could be called a Boarder poll!!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,130 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    trellheim wrote: »
    if its no-deal do borders have to go up in Gib and Cyprus as well ( the SBAs)

    Yep they will require borders although in Cyprus case two or three due to fact their bases are all over the place.
    Then again there is already limited crossing points as opposed to ours.
    First Up wrote: »
    If they strike a bi-lateral free trade deal with China then, yes Chinese cars could be imported tax free. Of course Japan and every other auto making country would look for the same as part of their trade deals.

    It would be a quick way to decimate the UK auto industry but if port congestion blocks JIT parts supply, the UK auto industry is scuppered anyway.

    The UK auto industry is not really the UKs.
    They have now only one indigenous manufacturer, Morgan.
    I think Noble have gone.

    All the major British marques are foreign owned.
    Land Rover/Jag are owned by Tata, a large chunk of which is ultimately owned by an Irish family, well they have the passports.
    Mini and Rolls is BMW, Bentley is VW, Vauxhall is PSA now
    Aston is on LSE, but has always been a loss making company for most of it's existence.

    And here is the thing that really complicates it, a lot of the components for the all of the cars built in UK, be it Britsh marques or the foreign marques, are imported and often from EU.
    For instance 60% of what goes into a Mini comes from France, Germany, Slovakia, Romania, Spain, etc.

    The British auto industry is kinda screwed anyway if there is a no deal, with or without cheap Chinese imports.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,815 ✭✭✭10000maniacs


    Not 100% if that's what it means.

    But if it did mean that, then, in essence it would mean thousands of more jobs gone in the UK I would think.

    Why would any manufacturer in the UK keep production there when they could move it somewhere considerably cheaper & just export to the UK (that, or just end up going out of business)

    A tariff is a percentage rate that is ascertained by looking up HTS code under which you classify a product being imported into a third country.
    The amount of duty depends on the quantity of the product being imported.


  • Registered Users Posts: 359 ✭✭black forest


    In the mean time the EU has upped it’s visa policy concerning UK citizens. For visitors there will be no visa for 90 days within every 180 day period. The same fits UK citizens with a Gib background. There is an already known pasus that there is a ongoing disput between UK and Spain concerning Gib but that’s definitely no annexion of Gib as it was portrayed beforehand.

    Working visas for the relevant country is still nececessary and can’t be controlled or issued by the EU. Brits living within the EU should get residency status as fast as possible. So there is not much new. A nice summary of all this here:


    https://twitter.com/stevepeers/status/1091307782920376320?s=21


    Edit: The CTA between UK and Ireland stays untouched.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,471 ✭✭✭EdgeCase


    greenpilot wrote: »
    Here is a question for you folks.

    I live in Co.Roscommon and the whole area is full of retired UK citizens who bought cheap houses and are living off their pensions while living permanently here in Ireland.
    Will they be entitled to receive their benefits while remaining here in Ireland? A few of the usual "We do things better in the UK" types are keen to tell me that they will be able to continue to live here as normal after Brexit.

    What do you think?

    The answer is at present unclear.

    Their private pensions and contributory pensions are likely to be unaffected but things like access to any public services would be subject to reciprocated arrangements in the UK for Irish citizens.

    I don't think anyone can really give absolute answers to any of this as the British Government isn't competent enough to have thought this through.

    If they do crash out, we really just don't know what could be impacted as the details haven't really been worked out.

    It's beyond shocking that any sane government could do something so poorly planned but, that's what you're dealing with.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,994 ✭✭✭ambro25


    I already knew about UK bankers, asset managers and insurers, but now we're taking to welcoming UK broadcasters as well: confirmation today that some UK-based broadcasters are in advanced talks with our Ministry for Medias and Telecoms, to locate their EU operation here.

    Just like (most) ex-City types, they've all asked for 'great discretion', so no names released. At least, we know it's not the BBC: they're looking at the Netherlands or Belgium instead.

    http://tab.news.paperjam.lu/news/le-luxembourg-ouvert-aux-broadcasters-anglais


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,575 ✭✭✭✭briany


    9 miles vs about 1000 miles in fairness.


    Not saying I agree with them keeping it, but they would have a far stronger argument than the Brits would have.

    The British are never going to give up Gibraltar without a proper fight. Not only is its culture British and not only do its residents vote overwhelmingly in favour of staying with the UK, but it is of strategic importance that is far too high for anything less than war to make it change hands, so Spain using simple emotional arguments is never really going to wash. The so-called 'joint sovereignty' option would be as good as it ever good with mere talking, but even that's been swept off the table for now.

    It's all another part of what makes the cliff edge an imposing sight. If the UK were ever to seek to rejoin the EU, Gibraltar would immediately become a massive issue, with Spain looking for all kinds of concessions in order to ratify the UK's re-accession. It's just one of the crows that the UK would have to eat.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,167 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


    Re Gibraltar, they're very very angry at the moment because it was called a colony in that EU document.


  • Registered Users Posts: 37,728 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    VinLieger wrote:
    BTW saying you don't give a "continental" about trade blocs or EU rules is exactly what brexiteers said before and since the referendum......
    Peace is much more important.
    VinLieger wrote:
    Yeah the EU really arent at fault here, the UK is responsible for this mess and nobody else.
    The EU have a responsibility to us. That responsibility includes making sure our lives are not in danger over a border.


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,508 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    EdgeCase wrote: »
    It's beyond shocking that any sane government could do something so poorly planned but, that's what you're dealing with.

    Exactly. They are so consumed with even trying to work out the very high level stuff (backstop) that they haven't given themselves any time to consider the realities of what is coming.


  • Registered Users Posts: 37,728 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Russman wrote:
    For a start, nobody is asking for any lives to be sacrificed. Nobody is going to force anyone to pick up a gun or make a bomb, that's all their own choice if they so do. You know, like taking responsibility for ones own actions ?
    We all know that a border will bring back the troubles. We are responsible if we put conditions in place which will start the troubles again.
    Russman wrote:
    All anyone of a nationalist leaning up there needs is patience and this would play itself out over a few months and the UK would likely be looking for a deal from the EU and part of that deal would no doubt be the border issue.
    It's not just nationalist, there is a unionist side too. Once one side kills one from the other side it's off and runny ng and it could take years to sort out if it ever stops.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,646 ✭✭✭✭El Weirdo


    eagle eye wrote: »
    Peace is much more important.


    The EU have a responsibility to us. That responsibility includes making sure our lives are not in danger over a border.

    You make it sound like we haven't had any input into how the EU are approaching the issue.


  • Registered Users Posts: 37,728 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    El Weirdo wrote:
    You make it sound like we haven't had any input into how the EU are approaching the issue.
    It appears that way to me anyways.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,994 ✭✭✭ambro25


    Hurrache wrote: »
    Re Gibraltar, they're very very angry at the moment because it was called a colony in that EU document.
    That 'colony' footnote is a seed for eventual consumption at the UN. The Spaniards are playing a very long game here, and this is just another opportunistic move within it: it's the aggregation of those discrete moves that matters, when eventually they should reach a critical, diplomatic mass.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 15,508 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    eagle eye wrote: »
    We all know that a border will bring back the troubles. We are responsible if we put conditions in place which will start the troubles again.

    We did put conditions in place to stop them, including deleting out previous territorial claim to part of the Island. It seems many people do not give this the seriousness that it deserves. As a country, we opted to reject that claim on the basis of securing lasting peace. Look at how the DUP are claiming that any movement away from the UK is a disaster, yet we moved on years ago.

    The UK have now decided, based on nothing more than some glib headlines and an apparent longing for the old empire days, to put that peace at risk but changing fundamentally the relationship between the UK and Ireland via the EU.

    By having both countries aligned to a third party, neither side felt they were capitulating. All that is being removed, meaning one way or another someone is going to feel that they have lost out due to Brexit.

    But you are right that we should, and I believe are, doing everything we can to avoid a return to violence.

    What is your proposal to square the circle that the UK have, after two years failed to come up with?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement