Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ireland Team Talk Thread IX: Grand Slam Champions SEE MOD WARNING POST #1122

Options
1251252254256257335

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 21,605 ✭✭✭✭Squidgy Black


    troyzer wrote: »
    Yeah, we can finally put the openside selection dilemma to bed now as well.

    Penny is clearly the best 7 in Ireland after his two professional games playing well against crap teams.

    Doris is clearly going to over take Stander as well. Get an IRISH player in there instead.


  • Registered Users Posts: 853 ✭✭✭foxyladyxx


    troyzer wrote: »
    Yeah, we can finally put the openside selection dilemma to bed now as well.

    Penny is clearly the best 7 in Ireland after his two professional games playing well against crap teams.

    What is happening everybody?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,462 ✭✭✭Downlinz


    Faugheen wrote: »
    What exactly does Farrell offer that the rest don't, though?

    Unless something happens to Ringrose, Aki or Henshaw, I can't see Farrell going to the World Cup. It makes no sense bringing 4 centres. 3 + 1 utility back is plenty.

    Unless that utility back is Henshaw, he fits the bench role perfectly as a centre / fullback.


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,605 ✭✭✭✭Squidgy Black


    Downlinz wrote: »
    Unless that utility back is Henshaw, he fits the bench role perfectly as a centre / fullback.

    Farrell doesn't play fullback. That's Addison you're thinking of.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,908 ✭✭✭jacothelad


    kuang1 wrote: »
    I don't it's overly fantastical to suggest that Farrell could overtake Aki over the course of the 6 nations.


    Aki is a 12 and Farrell is a 13.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 553 ✭✭✭Elvisjuice


    Its a joke....

    not a very good one .


  • Registered Users Posts: 654 ✭✭✭Gonad


    Who would Joe rather take to the World Cup

    Prime Tommy Bowe or the young Jacob Stockdale ?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Gonad wrote: »
    Who would Joe rather take to the World Cup

    Prime Tommy Bowe or the young Jacob Stockdale ?

    No brainer


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,149 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Gonad wrote: »
    Who would Joe rather take to the World Cup

    Prime Tommy Bowe or the young Jacob Stockdale ?

    Dave Kearney. Obviously


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,740 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    Anthony Horgan


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 159 ✭✭THFC198


    Andy Skehan


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Gonad wrote: »
    Who would Joe rather take to the World Cup

    Prime Tommy Bowe or the young Jacob Stockdale ?

    Bowe was so good back in 2013 that Gatland didn't send him home when he broke his arm on the Lions tour, instead keeping him around on the off chance it recovered early (which it did) and parachuted him into the test team for the second and third tests.

    He is one of the classiest, smartest rugby football players we've ever produced.

    Stockdale scores tries though. Last year there was a part of me that felt his try scoring record was incredible but with a good few relatively soft scores and a fair amount of risky opportunism. More recently and certainly post All Blacks win I can't help but feel he's much more gifted than I gave him credit for. He's big, strong, skilled and smart. Has much of Tommy's class but maybe a little more athletic overall.

    I think the real question is - if prime Tommy Bowe was available, who (if any) would miss out - Stockdale or Earls (or Kearney...?)?


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,740 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    Zebo.


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,605 ✭✭✭✭Squidgy Black


    Clegg wrote: »
    Zebo.

    Darragh Fanning


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,440 ✭✭✭The Rape of Lucretia


    Gonad wrote: »
    Who would Joe rather take to the World Cup

    Prime Tommy Bowe or the young Jacob Stockdale ?

    Bowser without a shadow of a doubt. Stocksie is a long long way from the finished article. He has done well for sure, and his place is not under serious threat at the moment. He may well reach Bowe's level or exceed it, but a lot of dvmt to go yet. At a guess, and its not at all to run down his very productive start in green, but feel he will not quite ever get to peak Bowe.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,728 ✭✭✭Former Former


    Tommy Bowe 2009 - 2014 was probably the best Irish winger of the professional era. It's unfortunate he was plagued by injury in his last couple of seasons but he'd be picked ahead of anyone we have now.


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,740 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    Gonad wrote: »
    Who would Joe rather take to the World Cup

    Prime Tommy Bowe or the young Jacob Stockdale ?

    Bowe was so good back in 2013 that Gatland didn't send him home when he broke his arm on the Lions tour, instead keeping him around on the off chance it recovered early (which it did) and parachuted him into the test team for the second and third tests.

    He is one of the classiest, smartest rugby football players we've ever produced.

    Stockdale scores tries though. Last year there was a part of me that felt his try scoring record was incredible but with a good few relatively soft scores and a fair amount of risky opportunism. More recently and certainly post All Blacks win I can't help but feel he's much more gifted than I gave him credit for. He's big, strong, skilled and smart. Has much of Tommy's class but maybe a little more athletic overall.

    I think the real question is - if prime Tommy Bowe was available, who (if any) would miss out - Stockdale or Earls (or Kearney...?)?
    If we had that many quality options we'd have to bring all 4 and cut back on a utility player. You run the risk of having to play one of them at FB if Kearney gets injured, but you need that try scoring ability in the side even if it's a bit lobsided.

    Fwiw I agree with your assessment on Bowe. He was often the highlight of the Kidney era teams where our attacking patterns in the backs were dreadful. He had very little to work with but got the very most out of it. At times it seemed the strategy was hoping BoD pulled off a bit of magic and that Bowe was running a support line.

    A 25 year old Bowe in last season's Ireland side would have been magic.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,797 ✭✭✭b.gud


    Bowser without a shadow of a doubt. Stocksie is a long long way from the finished article. He has done well for sure, and his place is not under serious threat at the moment. He may well reach Bowe's level or exceed it, but a lot of dvmt to go yet. At a guess, and its not at all to run down his very productive start in green, but feel he will not quite ever get to peak Bowe.

    220px-Bowser_-_New_Super_Mario_Bros_2.png


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,908 ✭✭✭jacothelad


    Clegg wrote: »
    Anthony Horgan


    Feck. I had just got over that and now you have caused it to emerge from the swamp again. Anto, the only international winger slower than a second row.:D:D:D


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,908 ✭✭✭jacothelad


    Bowe was so good back in 2013 that Gatland didn't send him home when he broke his arm on the Lions tour, instead keeping him around on the off chance it recovered early (which it did) and parachuted him into the test team for the second and third tests.

    He is one of the classiest, smartest rugby football players we've ever produced.

    Stockdale scores tries though. Last year there was a part of me that felt his try scoring record was incredible but with a good few relatively soft scores and a fair amount of risky opportunism. More recently and certainly post All Blacks win I can't help but feel he's much more gifted than I gave him credit for. He's big, strong, skilled and smart. Has much of Tommy's class but maybe a little more athletic overall.

    I think the real question is - if prime Tommy Bowe was available, who (if any) would miss out - Stockdale or Earls (or Kearney...?)?


    Stockdale also seems to be really, really fast at top speed where T.B. was quick but not searingly so, getting himself into the right position almost flawlessly.. Stockdale is a bit gangly and 'unco-ordinated by comparison and seems a bit prone to getting himself into awkward defensive positions that Bowe would have avoided.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    jacothelad wrote: »
    Stockdale also seems to be really, really fast at top speed where T.B. was quick but not searingly so, getting himself into the right position almost flawlessly.. Stockdale is a bit gangly and 'unco-ordinated by comparison and seems a bit prone to getting himself into awkward defensive positions that Bowe would have avoided.

    I don't think James O'Connor would have caught Stockdale in Auckland !


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,908 ✭✭✭jacothelad


    Clegg wrote: »
    Zebo.



    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ0AaRuR32CBisdX-qTi3x6WxuB1qyEnB1_axnHWicrypRaV7ZU


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,149 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    I think Stockdale will have a long career. He looks to a niche for scavenging the ball and he scores tries like it's natural.
    He is not the finished product, but he is extremely good at 22 yrs old!
    I think he'll be world class.
    If he was on Leinster, we'd prostrate ourselves before him and proclaim him "Messiah ".
    He still has a lot to learn and the finished product will be like North. At least I think he's going to be better than North.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,025 ✭✭✭vetinari


    Stockdale is arguably our second most important player after Sexton.
    In big games, he's proven himself to be a difference maker.
    I'm not sure if Bowe would have had the pace for the try against New Zealand.
    The try against England at Twickenham where he grounded the ball just before the dead ball line is another example.
    The try against Scotland where he cut back inside the last defender looks simple but 4 out of 5 Irish wings probably get tackled there and the ball has to be recycled.

    Bowe was a better all around player but Stockdale is a more potent attacking threat.
    You'd have to go back to early BOD days for a similar comparison.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,199 ✭✭✭troyzer


    vetinari wrote: »
    Stockdale is arguably our second most important player after Sexton.
    In big games, he's proven himself to be a difference maker.
    I'm not sure if Bowe would have had the pace for the try against New Zealand.
    The try against England at Twickenham where he grounded the ball just before the dead ball line is another example.
    The try against Scotland where he cut back inside the last defender looks simple but 4 out of 5 Irish wings probably get tackled there and the ball has to be recycled.

    Bowe was a better all around player but Stockdale is a more potent attacking threat.
    You'd have to go back to early BOD days for a similar comparison.

    Absolute nonsense.
    In terms of importance Ireland is basically this:

    Murray, Sexton, Kearney, Furlong, Toner, Stander, Ringrose, Healy and then everyone else.


  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    troyzer wrote: »
    Absolute nonsense.
    In terms of importance Ireland is basically this:

    Murray, Sexton, Kearney, Furlong, Toner, Stander, Ringrose, Healy and then everyone else.

    Think the AI shows we're not as reliant on Murray as we are Sexton.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,699 ✭✭✭The Pheasant2


    Faugheen wrote: »
    Think the AI shows we're not as reliant on Murray as we are Sexton.

    I agree, Sexton = MVP


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,328 ✭✭✭the baby bull elephant


    Bowe is Ireland's second highest ever try scorer with 64 less caps than BO'D in first place. I know Stockdale looks like someone who could end up with more tried but people seem to forget how dangerous Bowe was along with the other stuff he brought.


  • Administrators Posts: 53,398 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Bowe was up there with BOD and POC in terms of his ability and standing in his position.

    So asking if Stockdale is better than Bowe is like asking if Ringrose is better than BOD, or Ryan better than POC. The answer is no, not yet at least.

    He's only 22, and hopefully has another 10 years in the tank. A lot of room for him to grow.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 168 ✭✭The Parish King


    Anyone see in the Times today that Cuminksy included Doris in his squad of 31 for Japan?

    Hard to know if this was just a throwaway inclusion to generate some interest (as his logic seemed to be that there has to be a bolter within the forwards each RWC, and he also failed to mention Conan once!).

    But I guess my question is, is Doris really that highly rated? I haven’t been that impressed when I’ve seen him this year (more so that he hasn’t stood out, rather than unimpressed), however it is impressive to be getting this amount of game time straight after the u20s.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement